Poll
Image

Beeinflusst dich Spielmaterialausführung bei der Kaufentscheidung?

🇩🇪 Original in German

Hey, as I posted last time, the game material is often a deciding factor for me when buying a game—even if I don’t know much about it. No doubt games like Everdell look cute or the eggs in Wingspan, resources in Arnak, etc., but do you buy games for that too?

Poll

47 votes
Multiple choice: up to 4 answers ends on 02.11. 11:44

Current results

  1. JA - Spielmaterial ist sehr wichtig für ein gutes Spiel! 25,5 %12
  2. NEIN- Papptoken sind genauso gut! 2,1 %1
  3. Weder noch - ist mir komplett egal! 2,1 %1
  4. JEIN - Spielmaterial ist ok aber es ist nur ein Teil für ein großartiges Spielgefühl 78,7 %37

No names are shown – only the number of votes. You can change your choice while the poll is open.

Thomas Follow
Which posts …?
624 Views

Comments 10

↩ Replying to

Never shown publicly – only used to notify you about replies.

Sasch0r

🇩🇪 Original in German

I did vote yes, but it also heavily depends on the genre for me—with dungeon crawlers, I find it more important for immersion, so I paint all my minis... but with Euros, like *The Castles of Burgundy*, the standard components are fine for me since the mechanics are the priority.

Kaskodil

🇩🇪 Original in German

I love immersive materials, but personally, I think it's nonsense to spend a ton of money on upgrades. That's why, even with big titles that cost a lot, I'm not willing to drop even more cash on figures (like 3D-printed or wooden ones) when simple cardboard stands are included and work fine gameplay-wise. At the same time, I’ve got a good friend who swears by this stuff—including a proper gaming table—and it’s always a blast to play a Eurogame with the right materials.

Daniel Editorial

🇩🇪 Original in German

I voted "Jein" because I've learned that games with super game material aren't automatically super. I'd rather have a really well-executed game with simple materials that I can pimp out later if it's really good, than having to pay too much money for a bad game.

TomHai

🇩🇪 Original in German

Bin also part of the "jein" faction. For me, it's more like I usually buy the games normally and only if I really like them and play them a lot, I check if there's better game material for them. For example, I've been thinking for a while whether to get the Deluxe or Gamefound Edition for Robinson Crusoe.

Pesticyde

🇩🇪 Original in German

I'm also on the fence... I usually prefer games that have a more "classic" look over those with "modern" plastic minis. See the old What's Your Game stuff... With Spirit Island, I found that mix of wood and plastic—even if it was intentional—just awful somehow...

DreiWetterSaft

🇩🇪 Original in German

Das "Auge isst mit" fits for me in a figurative sense also with board games. But just for that reason I wouldn't buy a game either. Often I print out material myself (3D printing), if the cardboard tokens don't appeal to me.

Ergo

🇩🇪 Original in German

I just voted. Went with B, but I think the game components are important—well-made cardboard figures (we just had those in Quest) are way better than unpainted plastic minis. I loved the thick cardboard disks in Fateforge too.

Mabruk

🇩🇪 Original in German

When I play a game I really like, I prefer to have the best possible game components. Not at any cost, but if it's a good upgrade, then why not? I haven't regretted replacing all the cardboard tokens with wooden ones in Spirit Island so far.

Maniac

🇩🇪 Original in German

Hmm, well, I’d rarely buy a game just for its fancy components. First, I always check out the game board or cards to see if I like what I see—the style, whether it fits the theme I’m after, and if it captures the vibe I’m looking for. But if I already like a game’s theme and look in a crowdfunding campaign, I’ll sometimes chip in a bit more to snag nicer components or figures—like wood or plastic instead of cardboard tokens. That alone wouldn’t make me buy a game, though.

Post ID: #1183 — Please include this ID for questions or deletion requests.